The situation
Campus recruitment runs to the institution's calendar. Hundreds of students become available in a short window, and offers must be made before competitors move.
The constraint is interviewer availability in that window, so the number of students seen is set by how many panels can be staffed rather than by how many are worth seeing.
Why it is hard
The window is externally fixed
It cannot be extended to fit your capacity.
Panel availability is the real selector
Students are filtered by scheduling before they are assessed on ability.
Consistency suffers under compression
Panels running back-to-back drift in standard across a long day.
How we approach it
Aura Screen lets every student take a role-specific session in their own time within the window, by voice or text, with coding assessments where the role needs them.
Panels then meet a shortlist drawn from consistent evidence, and the number of students assessed stops depending on how many rooms you can staff.
What changes
- Every student assessed within the window, not only those who fit the schedule
- Consistent criteria applied across the whole cohort
- Panel time concentrated on a shortlist with evidence attached
- Sessions proctored, with coding assessment where relevant
Next
Is this your problem too?
Bring the version of it you actually have. We will tell you what it would take, including when the answer is that it is not worth doing.
N Catalyst.ai
Book a demo
