N Catalyst.ai
Book a demo
The situation
Reporting an imaging study depends on what came before: previous studies, the clinical question, the comorbidities, the treatment since. That context exists, but it is distributed across a record that was never organised for this question.
The practical result is that the prior which would change the interpretation is sometimes not surfaced, not because anyone failed, but because finding it required reading material nobody had time to read.
Why it is hard
Relevance is clinical, not chronological
The most recent prior is not always the one that matters. A study from six years ago can be the one that changes the read.
The record spans systems
Imaging, pathology, clinic letters and discharge summaries often live in different systems with different identifiers for the same patient episode.
Speed is part of correctness
Context that arrives after the report has been issued has not helped anybody.
How we approach it
Agentix assembles the relevant history for the study in front of the reporter, with each item cited and linked, so the context arrives as part of the reporting workflow rather than as a separate search.
Selection is driven by the clinical question rather than by recency, and the reasoning for including each item is visible so the reporter can disagree with it quickly.
What changes
- Relevant priors surfaced with the clinical reason for their inclusion
- History assembled across systems rather than within one
- Every item linked back to the source document
- The reporter remains the decision-maker throughout
Next
Is this your problem too?
Bring the version of it you actually have. We will tell you what it would take, including when the answer is that it is not worth doing.