The situation
Screening a technical candidate properly requires a technical conversation and some practical work. Both require an engineer, and engineers are the scarce resource the hire is meant to address.
So screening gets compressed: fewer candidates reach a technical conversation, and the filter before it falls back on CV signals.
Why it is hard
A CV is weak evidence of technical ability
It describes context and tenure. It says little about how someone reasons through a problem.
Take-home exercises select for availability
They measure who had a free weekend as much as who can do the work.
Late discovery is the expensive failure
A technical gap found at final stage has consumed several people's time to discover.
How we approach it
Aura Screen runs a conversational technical interview tailored to the role and sets a practical coding assessment in the same session, returning scored results with the candidate's actual answers attached.
Engineers then spend their time on candidates who have already demonstrated the fundamentals, and they start from the transcript rather than from the beginning.
What changes
- Technical conversation and coding assessment in one session
- Engineer time spent on candidates who cleared the fundamentals
- Answers attached to scores so the judgement can be checked
- Practical work assessed without a weekend-sized take-home
Next
Is this your problem too?
Bring the version of it you actually have. We will tell you what it would take, including when the answer is that it is not worth doing.
N Catalyst.ai
Book a demo
